The rise of the Black Panther Party in 1966
marked the beginning of a new civil rights movement that is still
criticized for it's employment of violent measures. Yet the party
represented so much more, focusing on not only self-defense, but also
the general elevation of a race through public welfare programs
designed and executed by panther members. One must wonder why no one
seems to remember the soup kitchens and health clinics. While stories
of protests and brutality tend to overshadow human interest stories
in most media, something larger was at play. 1966 was host to the
rise of the Black Panthers and also the dissent of mainstream press
coverage. Integrity disintegrated. The press diverted its intent from
proper representation of the Civil Rights Movement in order to
cultivate a negative image of the radical Panthers. From 1968 to 1970
the press made the Panthers into monsters through highlighting
contradictions with in the movement, belittling it's leaders and
emphasizing only the militant characteristics of the party.
Panthers in Print
How the mainstream press tamed the beast of the Black Panther Party and betrayed the Civil Rights Movement...
'The Panther Invasion': Creating a Man Killer
The mainstream press was devoted to the
singular image of the Black Panther as a fighter, a killer and a
ruthless beast. The Oakland Tribune called the rise of the party
an “invasion” (13), setting the precedent for coverage focused on
violence. During a protest of a gun bill at the California Assembly
on May 2nd, 1967, armed men and women gathered in a silent
crowd and though no violence occurred, a wire service story said the
protestors “roamed” “barged” and “shouted” (6). The scene
could have been just as easily described with the words, “marched”,
“assembled” and “demanded” as other protests had been
described in the past (13). But the real story wasn't in the protest
at all, journalists were reporting on the threat that the Panthers
represented to the status quo, and through their word choice it is
clear they meant for this “threat” to be viewed negatively.
Television focused on violence and conflict between races, especially in groups (10) |
Black leaders became synonymous with
violence. In May1967, The New York Times ran an article
entitled “A gun is power, Black Panther says,” an interview with
Huey Newton, main leader of the Panthers. It went on for paragraphs
describing him in a shroud of ammunition, describing his body guards
holding their weapon menacingly and brandishing their power. A
similar article in Time read “'thinking black' is Huey
Newton and his rage—a rage so blinding he can look on white America
comfortably only through the cross hairs of a gun”, clearly showing
how the Panthers became animals, reduced to primal anger. While there
is no denying the militancy of Newton, there is also no justification
for such a one sided view of his character.
To a white readership, cut off for the
most part from the alternative Black press, the effect was damaging.
Bobby Seale, Panther leader, said whites were “at the mercy of the
new media” (13)., which perpetuated an inaccurate view of the party
“sure to spread a wave of panic in white suburbia” (13). It can
be said that the violent image surrounding the Panthers can be
attributed, at least partially, to their staging of pseudo events
(6), which naturally diverted the press' attention. Nevertheless, the
effect was a media unable to differentiate, “between what the
Panthers meant to the nation symbolically and the real threat they
posed” (6).
Capturing the Beast: Panthers in Pictures
Photo from http://web.mac.com/christiandavenport. |
Picture of peace full protest (1) |
Free Huey Rally, Oakland (1) |
Panthers assembled in a park (1) |
Still from CBS report, 1969 (3) |
“The Melodrama is Real”(12): The Panthers as a Joke
During the late 60's a cloud of
negativity surrounded the Black Panthers. The media enveloped the
group in demeaning descriptions. The language of the press clearly
illustrates their hegemonistic tendencies. When Stokely Carmichael
told the press that the assassination of Marin Luther King Jr. would
lead to increased violence, the New York Times called him “psychotic”
(6). Carmichael's assertions were indeed bold, especially when he
said that the assassination was akin to a declaration of war on the
black population, yet he is far from insane. In fact, retrospectively
he was correct. Even if his ideas were outlandish, how can a
self-respecting publication use such strongly opinionated vocabulary? The New York Times had also covered the Panthers' strike at Yale, which
they said, “plunged campus activism into new depths of
irrationality” (2). However this story had run in the opinion
section, justifying the stronger language.
Language was also used against the
Panthers in a different way. Often publications made a spectacle of
the course diction of the panthers and their rhetoric was connected
with an image of an uneducated ruffian. By putting phrases like “cop
dogs” and “pigs” (words commonly used by Panthers to describe
white oppressors) in quotations, journalists made the words jump off
the page, emphasizing their ridiculousness (13). This helped papers
define the panthers as a largely illiterate and unintelligent
movement. A 1970 Seattle Times article uses this quotation method and
then at the end of the article reinforces the stupidity of the
Panthers with the reminder that none of the Panthers are currently
enrolled in school (12). Media coverage loved to report the fact that
Huey Newton was an illiterate high school drop out as if it was
somehow indicative of the entire movement, though Newton proudly
admitted to the fact and later went on to earn a PhD (8).
Even the
headlines of some articles were employed to make the Panthers seem
dumb. “Angry
Blacks Berate Solons In Eloquent Capitol Lecture” read one Seattle
Post-Intelegencer article, juxtaposing the words “eloquent” and “angry” to make the group seem ridiculous and volatile to
their pristine surroundings (14). Some papers went so far as to
emphasize irrelevant details just for the sake of dragging the party
down. An article reporting declined membership to the party said some
described the group as “bumbling” and included an unrelated
anecdote about how Panther demolition expert, “blew himself up
while trying to throw a bomb at his girl friend” (11). The amusing
detail provided color to the story, but was of no worth to the
article and no doubt was included to make a jab at the Panthers.
Seattle Times article, 1970 (12) |
Article printed in the Seattle Times, 1970 (11) |
Seattle Post Intelegencer article, 1969 (14) |
Panthers
were also ridiculed by the press when they were deemed not worthy of
being quoted in stories about their own affairs. It was sort of
journalist tradition at the time for African Americans to be
under-represented in the news when the stories were not specifically
about them (4), but to leave the Black Panthers out of a story about
the Black Panthers was unprecedented. Especially when the Panthers
were in legal trouble or when they were facing public criticism,
interviews were rarely sought. The Oakland
Tribune
ran a side bar of the “Background of the Black Panthers” in which
they informed the public that the police were in control of the group.
Yet if the writers of this piece were to interview Panthers, they
would have found a very different perspective, since the Panthers
believed that they were keeping the police it line, not the other way
around.
Perhaps the most alarming tactic used
to de-legitimatize the Panthers was the frequent connections drawn
between the party and the Klu Klux Klan. Many publications went as
far as to say that the Panthers had become the bastions of hate and
evil that they rebelled against so strongly(15). Televised news
between 1968 and 1970 portrayed the Panthers as more violent and
hateful than white racists and was more skeptical of their movement
(6). An editorial in the Oakland Tribune
entitled “Playtime in Sacramento” ridiculed the party essentially
for playing dress up, putting on berets and guns and acting out a
silly revolution complete with “a secret name” (13). The piece
drew connections between the two groups, each in their own costume.
As a result the media became unable to “distinguish between the
donning of a white hood and the wearing of a black berets as symbolic
practices” (13).
An Exceptional Exception
Seattle Times article, 1968 (7) |
Further Research and Limitations
There is a hole in my research that I
will not deny and that is if the coverage of the Black Panther
Movement was not to some degree justified. The media focused on the
violence of the movement, and indeed there was a considerable amount
of turbulence surrounding the panthers. They highlighted the division
of the black community on the use of violence, and indeed a dichotomy
did exist. With in the frame of my research I have concluded that
while news coverage of the time was factual, it was not an accurate
or fair depiction of the heart of the issue. It ignored whole parts
of the story, blatantly leaving out interviews Panther supporters and
belittled the movement as objective news never should.
One must also keep in mind that the
press may not have done this intentionally, after all, media tends to
be simply a mirror to society. It shapes public opinion, yet it also
reflects it. The casting of the panthers as monsters may have been
the press's doing, or it may have been already decided on by the
public. This is one area of further research that peaks my interest.
I also limited my study to only
include mainstream papers, but during my research I was drawn to
alternative press. How the values of these papers differ? Did black
papers, like the one published by the Black Panthers themselves,
highlight violence as the more widely distributed publications did?
Conclusion
With harsh language and selective
anecdotes the Black Panthers became a group to be feared and hated by
the American public. While their humanitarian efforts were ignored by
the press, violence and crime associated with the group never eluded
the eye of the media. Through an examination of newspapers,
photography and television in the late sixty's one can see that the
press turned against a faction of the Civil Rights Movement with
their biased coverage and the Panthers became a beast.
Works Cited
- Baruch, Ruth-Marion, and Pirkle Jones. The Vanguard: A Photographic Essay on the Black Panthers. Boston: Beacon, 1970. Print.
- Bass, Paul, and Douglas W. Rae. Murder in the Model City: The Black Panthers, Yale, and the Redemption of a Killer. New York: Basic, 2006. Print.
- CBS News. "Bobby Rush Kept Handgun and Communist Literature in Apartment." YouTube. YouTube, 08 Mar. 2009. Web. 01 Mar. 2012. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTUFIRd32FM>.
- Dates, Jannette Lake, and William Barlow. Split Image: African Americans in the Mass Media. Washington, D.C.: Howard UP, 1990. Print.
- "'Either He or I Was Going to Get Shot,' Policeman Tells Jury." Seattle Times [Seattle] 15 Oct. 1968. Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project. University of Washington. Web. 1 Mar. 2012. <http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/BPP_news%20coverage.htm>.
- Larson, Stephanie Greco. Media & Minorities: The Politics of Race in News and Entertainment. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006. Print.
- Loken, Marty. "Black Students Seek New Corses." Seattle Times [Seattle] 5 Nov. 1968. Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project. University of Washington. Web. 1 Mar. 2012. <http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/BPP_news%20coverage.htm>.
- Lule, Jack. Daily News, Eternal Stories: The Mythological Role of Journalism. New York: Guilford, 2001. Print.
- Marx, Gary T. Protest and Prejudice: A Study of Belief in the Black Community. New York: Harper & Row, 1967. Print.
- Merelman, Richard M. Representing Black Culture: Racial Conflict and Cultural Politics in the United States. New York: Routledge, 1995. Print.
- Prochnau, William W. "Panthers Failing, Detective Testifies." Seattle Times [Seattle] 13 May 1970. Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project. University of Washington. Web. 29 Feb. 2012. <http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/BPP_news%20coverage.htm>.
- Prochnau, William W. "Seattle Panthers Get Grants, Food Stamps, Probers Charge." Seattle Times [Seattle] 14 May 1970. Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project. University of Washington. Web. 1 Mar. 2012. <http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/BPP_news%20coverage.htm>.
- Rhodes, Jane. Framing the Black Panthers: The Spectacular Rise of a Black Power Icon. New York: New, 2007. Print.
- Scates, Shelby. "Angry Blacks Berate Solons In Eloquent Capitol Lecture." Seattle Post-Intelligencer [Seattle] 1 Mar. 1969: 2. Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project. University of Washington. Web. 29 Feb. 2012. <http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/BPP_news%20coverage.htm>.
- Ward, Brian. Media, Culture, and the Modern African American Freedom Struggle. Gainesville: University of Florida, 2001. Print.
Picture Credits and Sites Consulted
"BlackPanther.org." BlackPanther.org. Web. 02 Mar. 2012. <http://www.blackpanther.org/>.
"BPP - the Black Panther Party - Photographs by Roz Payne." NEWSREEL FILMS. Web. 02 Mar. 2012. <http://www.newsreel.us/panthers/index.htm>.
"How The Fbi Attacked The Black Panther Party | Old News." Old News Blog. Web. 02 Mar. 2012. <http://oldnews.aadl.org/node/196860>.
"Huey Newton : Biography." Spartacus Educational. Web. 02 Mar. 2012. <http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAnewtonH.htm>.
"MIM's Black Panther Newspaper Collection." The Maoist Internationalist Ministry of Prisons. Web. 02 Mar. 2012. <http://www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext/bpp/index.html>.
Pan-African News Wire. "Pan-African News Wire." : Huey P. Newton on Black, Gay and Women's Liberation. Web. 02 Mar. 2012. <http://panafricannews.blogspot.com/2011/05/huey-p-newton-on-black-gay-and-women.html>.
"State
Coercion, Perspective and the Black Panther Party, 1967-1973." The
Black Panthers vs. the US Government.
Web. 1 Mar. 2012. <http://web.mac.com/christiandavenport/iWeb/Site%205/The%20Black%20Panther%20Party%20vs.%20the%20US%20Government.html>.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)